It's not the big bad CTS-V, but looks fun.

Kinja'd!!! "The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock" (jukesjukesjukes)
12/17/2016 at 12:50 • Filed to: None

Kinja'd!!!0 Kinja'd!!! 9

!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! I think they look great, and apparently the 3.6L V6 is a great engine.

Kinja'd!!! Kinja'd!!!

 

Kinja'd!!!

dat ass. It’s a nice ass.


DISCUSSION (9)


Kinja'd!!! PatBateman > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock
12/17/2016 at 12:59

Kinja'd!!!0

I have that same engine in my CTS sedan. It’s plenty fun.


Kinja'd!!! Your boy, BJR > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock
12/17/2016 at 13:09

Kinja'd!!!0

My mom had one. Black/black rwd Lux package. What a fantastic car.


Kinja'd!!! Textured Soy Protein > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock
12/17/2016 at 13:13

Kinja'd!!!1

I test drove one in my most recent round of car shopping and didn’t really like it. The seats were hard, the steering felt dead, and the visibility was as bad as you’d expect.


Kinja'd!!! The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock > Textured Soy Protein
12/17/2016 at 13:14

Kinja'd!!!0

I’m use to bad visibility with my Juke. 


Kinja'd!!! Tristan > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock
12/17/2016 at 13:14

Kinja'd!!!1

I want to like the CTS coupe... I really do. I just... can’t. The sedan looks great, but the coupe and the wagon both are just so awkwardly styled. I love coupes and wagons, but if I bought a CTS, it would be a sedan.


Kinja'd!!! Nick Has an Exocet > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock
12/17/2016 at 13:15

Kinja'd!!!0

Man, almost nothing matters because these LOOK great.


Kinja'd!!! Textured Soy Protein > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock
12/17/2016 at 13:18

Kinja'd!!!0

I’m a stickler for good visibility and I know it’s less important to other files. I just remember my overall impression of that car was basically, “nope, not interested at all,” and not just because of the visibility.


Kinja'd!!! theloudmouth > The Crazy Kanuck; RIP Oppositelock
12/17/2016 at 16:04

Kinja'd!!!0

Shitty, cramped interior and zero visibility. Acceptable in a dedicated sports car, unacceptable in a car that’s “luxury” first and everything else second.


Kinja'd!!! theloudmouth > Textured Soy Protein
12/17/2016 at 16:06

Kinja'd!!!0

+1, It’s a piece of garbage. We had one as a pool car. Beyond all the usual GM problems (crap interior, bad seats, etc) my head hit the damn headliner. I’m not short at 6'4" but I’m not overly tall either, this is a LARGE coupe from an American company, not a Japanese one, and the fact I don’t fit is appalling.

Edit: the visibility makes a Countach look practical. Even past the rearward, the A pillars are terrible too.